Fill the information below and we’ll get back to you soon.
Teams. Shipping already.
WE SPUN OFF 12 PARALLEL AGENTS AND NAP REFACTORED ALL OUR CODEBASE IN 3 HOURS
AT ZETA, ITS IMPORTANT FOR US TO FIND BUGS AND FLAWS BEFORE WE DEPLOY. NOW ITS ENTIRELY HANDLED BY NAP
END TO END INTEGRATION MATTER FOR OUR BUSINESS AND NAP IS GREAT FOR THAT
FAQs
Nap for enterprise teams is meant to fit into the way a real engineering org already ships software. Developers can use Nap from the terminal for feature work, code review, debugging, security checks, refactors, and release cleanup, while admins can keep usage, billing, seats, and access under control.
The important part is consistency. A team can use shared rules, common review expectations, security-first workflows, and organisation-level usage tracking so Nap does not become a random tool used differently by every person. The goal is to make AI coding useful without making the codebase harder to govern.
Yes, but we prefer doing it carefully. Enterprise rollout should start with a small group, a few representative repositories, and clear rules for what Nap can and cannot change. That gives your team room to test the workflow before it becomes part of daily engineering.
Security-sensitive areas like auth, payments, database policies, infrastructure, secrets, and customer data should be handled with extra review. Nap is designed around inspect-first workflows, scoped diffs, and visible verification so the team can understand what changed before anything is merged.
Enterprise billing can be handled at the organisation level instead of every developer paying separately. Seats, usage, credits, invoices, and plan details can be connected to the company account so finance and engineering both have a cleaner view of spend.
For larger teams, this matters because AI usage should not be invisible. You should be able to understand who is using Nap, how much is being used, what plan the team is on, and when the next billing cycle happens. That makes it easier to forecast spend and avoid surprise usage problems.
Enterprise teams can reach us for onboarding, rollout planning, workflow design, billing questions, and help shaping Nap around the way their engineering team works. If your team has strict security, review, or compliance habits, we can help map Nap into those habits instead of forcing a generic setup.
You can write to support@nap-code.com with your team size, codebase type, security concerns, and what you want Nap to help with first. We will use that context to recommend a practical rollout instead of handing you a vague sales answer.
That is one of the main reasons teams bring Nap in. Nap can help developers review risky changes, inspect generated code, check sensitive flows, and keep diffs smaller and easier to reason about. It is especially useful around auth, permissions, APIs, billing, Supabase, environment handling, and production-facing code.
Nap should not replace your final human review, but it can make the review process stronger. The point is to catch more problems earlier, make AI-generated patches less messy, and give teams a shared standard for what good, secure, anti-slop code should look like.
